Astrophysics

Large scale structure surveys are one of our primary tools for answering open questions in cosmology like: What is the physics behind dark energy? Is gravity well described by general relativity on cosmological scales, or does that description need to be extended? In order to take full advantage of the information contained in survey data, however, we must ensure that we understand our data’s sensitivity to new physics and that our analyses are not biased by systematics. In my talk I’ll describe work I have been doing in this aim for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). I’ll begin with an introduction to how we can use data from surveys like the DES to test LCDM, including approaches to constraining extensions to general relativity with cosmological data. I’ll use that discussion to motivate a so-called growth-geometry split analysis, a consistency test of LCDM that works by comparing constraints from probes of structure growth and expansion history, and will discuss the status of such an analysis applied to DES data. I’ll also give an overview of the blinding strategy planned for future multi-probe DES cosmology analyses.

If a black hole horizon has its microscopic structure as is conjectured by the candidates of quantum gravity, the dispersion relation of gravitational waves (GWs) near the horizon may be drastically modified since its wavelength can be comparable to the size of the microscopic structure because of its infinite gravitational blue-shift near the horizon.  We investigate ringdown-GWs from a perturbed black hole with such a modified dispersion relation and found that the change of modified dispersion relation near the horizon would lead to the partial reflection of infalling GWs at the horizon and echo-signals may appear in the late-time of ringdown-GWs. This implies that the echoes can be a supporting evidence of the existence of microscopic degrees of freedom on black hole horizons.