Conference

Feedback from active galactic nuclei (AGN) plays an essential role in current models of galaxy formation, yet the details of this process remain highly uncertain. I will describe our work combining numerical simulations with microwave, X-ray, and large-scale structure (LSS) survey data to better constrain this process. Our team has conducted a series of simulations spanning a broad range of feedback properties, enabling us to investigate their effects on the circumgalactic medium (CGM). At microwave wavelengths, we use these simulations to predict the thermal and kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich (SZ) effects. We compare these predictions with stacked data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) to derive constraints on AGN feedback. Additionally, we outline plans to improve these constraints with the TolTEC camera on the Large Millimeter Telescope (LMT). At X-ray wavelengths, we apply these simulations to predict soft X-ray emission, which we compare with stacked eROSITA observations. A persistent challenge in interpreting these comparisons is the influence of halo mass. I will discuss how weak gravitational lensing can help resolve this issue, offering new insights into the co-evolution of galaxies and their AGN.

The circumgalactic medium (CGM) around massive galaxies plays a crucial role in regulating star formation and feedback. Using the CAMELS cosmological simulation suites, we develop emulators for the X-ray surface brightness profile and the X-ray luminosity–stellar mass scaling relation to investigate how stellar and AGN feedback shape the X-ray properties of the hot CGM. Our analysis shows that stellar feedback more significantly impacts the X-ray properties than AGN feedback within the parameters studied. Comparing the emulators to recent eROSITA All-Sky Survey observations, we found stronger feedback is needed than those currently implemented in the IllustrisTNG, SIMBA, and Astrid simulations, in order to match observed CGM properties. However, adopting these enhanced feedback parameters leads to deviations in the observed stellar-mass-halo-mass relations below the group mass scale. This tension suggests possible unaccounted systematics in X-ray CGM observations or inadequacies in the feedback models of cosmological simulations. Finally, I will also highlight upcoming X-ray constraints of feedback in the group and cluster scales with new CAMELS simulations and compare with those obtained at the CGM scale.

Secondary anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) contain a wealth of cosmological and astrophysical information.  However, cleanly separating the individual contributions of the various kinds of anisotropies from each other can be a very challenging task, owing to uncertainties in their spatial, temporal, and spectral dependencies.  Realistic mock simulations of the CMB sky are invaluable for testing our methods of separating out the various signals and for making like-with-like comparisons between theory and observations.  Previous mocks have relied mostly on dark matter-only simulations with various prescriptions for "painting on" astrophysical signals.  Here we present a new set of mocks based on the FLAMINGO suite of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, where the various anisotropies (tSZ, kSZ, screening, CIB, lensing, radio sources) are derived directly from the properties of the matter, gas and accreting black holes in the simulations.  We show that the simulations can reproduce various observational constraints with high accuracy.  We also show how these signals depend on cosmology and feedback modelling, and we predict interesting cross-correlations between some of the signals that differs significantly from that predicted by previous mocks.

Exascale computing is enabling a new generation of cosmological simulations, spanning both gravity-only and full hydrodynamics at unprecedented scale. The Frontier Exascale Simulation is the largest hydrodynamic run to date by over an order of magnitude, evolving more than 4 trillion particles in a 4.6 Gpc volume down to redshift zero. The simulation is well suited for predictive comparisons with multi-wavelength observations and for constructing full-sky mock surveys for upcoming observatories. In addition, a new suite of gravity-only simulations is now reaching beyond 10 trillion particles, producing survey-encompassing mocks ideal for large-scale structure analysis and tests of primordial non-Gaussianity. This talk will highlight these capabilities and their role in advancing predictive cosmology and survey science.

There is no consensus on how baryonic feedback shapes the underlying matter distribution. This uncertainty is a limiting systematic for cosmic shear inference, particularly in the era of LSST, and a fundamental question in the study of galaxy evolution. Modern simulations are tuned to reproduce a variety of galaxy observations, however, previous studies demonstrated that the implied amplitude of baryon feedback is dependent on the chosen observable: e.g., X-ray gas fractions, which are sensitive to material within the virial radius of massive clusters, or kinematic Sunyaev Zeldovich (kSZ) profiles, which extend to a few virial radii [Bigwood+2024, McCarthy+2024]. In this talk, we address the uncertain observational landscape, by adopting a multi-observation view of feedback. We will present measurements for the gas and mass distribution as seen by eROSITA X-rays, DESI+ACT kSZ, and galaxy-galaxy lensing across a wide range of redshifts (0

The impact of feedback from galaxy formation on cosmological probes is typically quantified in terms of the suppression of the matter power spectrum in hydrodynamical compared to gravity-only simulations. In this paper, we instead study how baryonic feedback impacts halo assembly histories and thereby imprints on cosmological observables. We investigate the sensitivity of the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (tSZ) power spectrum, X-ray number counts, weak lensing and kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) stacked profiles to halo populations as a function of mass and redshift. We then study the imprint of different feedback implementations in the FLAMINGO suite of cosmological simulations on the assembly histories of these halo populations, as a function of radial scale. We find that kSZ profiles target lower-mass halos (M200m∼10^13.1M⊙) compared to all other probes considered (M200m∼10^15M⊙). Feedback is inefficient in high-mass clusters with ∼10^15M⊙ at z=0, but was more efficient at earlier times in the same population, with a ∼5-10% effect on mass at 22). These findings are tied together by noting that, regardless of redshift, feedback most efficiently redistributes baryons when halos reach a mass of M200m≃10^12.8M⊙ and ceases to have any significant effect by the time M200m≃10^15M⊙. We put forward strategies for minimizing sensitivity of lensing analyses to baryonic feedback, and for exploring baryonic resolutions to the unexpectedly low tSZ power in cosmic microwave background observations.

Observational surveys of the distribution of matter in the universe are becoming ever more precise and continue to be extended to smaller scales. This necessitates accounting for the fact that baryons do not precisely trace the dark matter. The redistribution of baryons by galactic winds, which is the major bottleneck in our understanding of galaxy evolution, therefore requires a convergence between models of large-scale structure and cosmology. I will discuss some of the insights gained from cosmological, hydrodynamical simulations, and challenges that need to be overcome to make further progress. I will present recent results from the FLAMINGO suite of large-volume cosmological, hydrodynamical simulations, which provide insight into the importance of baryonic effects for cosmology using large-scale structure and galaxy clusters. Finally, I will present the COLIBRE simulations of galaxy formation, a new suite of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations that removes important shortcomings of previous simulations.

Terrestrial ecosystems exhibit ecological stability: If an ecosystem is perturbed, biological feedback drives it back toward an equilibrium state, but an ecosystem does not remain stuck in its equilibrium state because it is continually perturbed. Are galaxies really similar to biological ecosystems in that regard? My talk will consider whether the atmospheres of galaxies have feedback-regulated equilibrium states and what the observational consequences of those states might be. While considering those questions I will lay out a framework for classifying how halo-scale feedback loops operate.