Conference

Scientific research is facing mounting challenges: overwhelmed reviewers, fragmented expertise, an outdated and inefficient system for allocating resources, and dissemination tools that no longer match the complexity and scale of modern scientific output. In this talk, I speak both as a researcher and as the founder of a successful startup to explore what a more coherent, future-ready scientific ecosystem could look like. Drawing on real prototypes and emerging tools, I’ll outline how we might reshape the way we publish, collaborate, and share not just to fix what’s broken, but to unlock what science could become tomorrow.

In the past two years, the LLM has made significant progress in math and reasoning, but it has not been applied widely in scientific research tasks. In this talk I will give a brief introduction to our on-going efforts on building the first AI scientist platform, where all researchers in different fields can contribute to teaching the AI scientists via contributing benchmarks and contributing specialized tools. We believe that by providing AI with the real-time updates of benchmarks and research tools, we are starting to enter an era with innovation driven by new types of human-AI collaboration.

This talk explores how artificial intelligence could transform theoretical physics over the next 25 years by addressing the crucial challenge of navigating an increasingly complex scientific literature landscape. We introduce Litmaps, a platform leveraging AI and visualization techniques to accelerate literature discovery and insights. We illustrate Litmaps' current capabilities in rapidly identifying relevant connections and advancing theoretical research. We also outline critical engineering challenges, including open access to historical literature, data standardization, and managing uncertainty in AI models. Finally, we highlight the importance of collaboration among physicists, AI researchers, engineers, and entrepreneurs, to realise the AI-enhanced future of theoretical physics research.

From the start of AI, mathematical theorem proving has been an important challenge and technique. We sketch the topics of Automated and Interactive Theorem Proving and present the checking of naturally readable mathematical texts in the Naproche proof system. This involves translations between informal, semi-formal and formal mathematical languages and shows great potential for the use of new AI techniques.

What would effective and usable tools for searching text and graphics in research papers look like? In this talk we sketch a partial answer to this question, with reference to recent work in the Document and Pattern Recognition Lab at RIT. Two multimodal paper search prototypes, one for math (MathDeck) and one for chemistry (ReactionMiner search) will be used for illustration. A simple framework based on 'jars' of available information sources can organize and relate the actions performed by people and automated systems when retrieving, analyzing, and synthesizing sources. We will organize our answer sketch around this framework, and share open questions and research opportunities related to enhancing multi-modal search tools for expert and non-expert users. Note: ReactionMiner was developed in collaboration with NCSA and the Han lab at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. MathDeck demo: [https://people.rit.edu/ma5339/mathdeck_landing](https://people.rit.edu/ma5339/mathdeck_landing) ReactionMiner search demo: [https://reactionminer.platform.moleculemaker.org/home](https://reactionminer.platform.moleculemaker.org/home) Biography: Richard Zanibbi is a Professor of Computer Science at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT, USA) where he directs the Document and Pattern Recognition Lab (dprl@RIT). His research focuses upon the recognition and retrieval of graphical notations, particularly for mathematics and chemistry. He is also a member of the Molecule Maker Lab Institute (MMLI), one of the first NSF AI Centers. He received his PhD from Queen's University (Canada), and was an NSERC Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre for Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (CENPARMI) at Concordia University before joining RIT.

This short talk will outline some of LaTeXML's uses as infrastructure, as well as its enabling effect for search, AI, assistive technologies and the mobile web. We have been on a journey towards scholarly articles with web-native mathematics since the dawn of the internet. The physics Open Science movement has led the way along with LaTeX, its authoring framework of choice. NIST's LaTeXML is a conversion tool that in the last twenty years has increasingly bridged that gap.

The rise of AI, in particular recent LLM based tools, has had an immediate impact on the production of physics, in ways both good and bad. I discuss some of the impact seen on arXiv in particular, what the status quo and prospects are, and speculate on the longer term impact.

UniverseTBD is an interdisciplinary community of astronomers, AI researchers, engineers, artists and enthusiasts aligned on a bold mission to democratise Science for everyone. From releasing the first large language model in Astronomy, AstroLLaMA-1, to the AI-enabled literature discovery tool Pathfinder, and through our research with AstroPT and HypoGen, our team has pushed the boundaries of AI for Science for the past two years. In this talk, I discuss for the first time how UniverseTBD came to be, our vision, our values, and what drives us and has enabled us to scale our team projects in our commitment to share our learnings with the broader scientific community. I also briefly discuss our latest results with hypothesis generation (HypoGen), multimodal language models (AstroLlaVA-1) and agentic AI (AstroCoder). I conclude with a vision for the future where AI teams up with human researchers to "help us understand the Universe".

The newest large-language reasoning models are for the first time powerful enough to perform mathematical reasoning in theoretical physics at graduate level. In the mathematics community, data sets such as FrontierMath are being used to drive progress and evaluate models, but theoretical physics has so far received less attention. In this talk I will present our dataset TPBench (arxiv:2502.15815, tpbench.org), which was constructed to benchmark and improve AI models specifically for theoretical physics. We find extremely rapid progress of models over the last months, but also significant challenges at research level difficulty. I will also briefly outline strategies to improve these models for theoretical physics.

Recent advancements have positioned Large Language Models (LLMs) as transformative tools for scientific research, capable of addressing complex tasks that require reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making. Their exceptional capabilities suggest their potential as scientific research assistants, but also highlight the need for holistic, rigorous, and domain-specific evaluation to assess effectiveness in real-world scientific applications. This talk describes a multifaceted methodology for Evaluating AI models as scientific Research Assistants (EAIRA) developed at Argonne National Laboratory. This methodology incorporates four primary classes of evaluations. 1) Multiple Choice Questions to assess factual recall; 2) Open Response to evaluate advanced reasoning and problem-solving skills; 3) Lab-Style Experiments involving detailed analysis of capabilities as research assistants in controlled environments; and 4) Field-Style Experiments to capture researcher-LLM interactions at scale in a wide range of scientific domains and applications. These complementary methods enable a comprehensive analysis of LLM strengths and weaknesses with respect to their scientific knowledge, reasoning abilities, and adaptability. Recognizing the rapid pace of LLM advancements, we designed the methodology to evolve and adapt so as to ensure its continued relevance and applicability. This talk describes the current methodology's state. Although developed within a subset of scientific domains, the methodology is designed to be generalizable to a wide range of scientific domains.