Quantum Physics

Displaying 1441 - 1452 of 2286

A non-commuting stabilizer formalism

Xiaotong Ni Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics - Albert Einstein Institute (AEI)
April 09, 2014

PIRSA:14040136
Quantum Physics

General Relativity & Quantum Cosmology
Beyond local causality: causation and correlation after Bell

Matthew Pusey University of York
April 08, 2014

PIRSA:14040130
Quantum Physics
Quantum Computing with Noninteracting Particles

Alex Arkhipov Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
April 02, 2014

PIRSA:14040077
Quantum Physics
Incompatibility of observables in quantum theory and other probabilistic theories
April 01, 2014

PIRSA:14040075
Quantum Physics
The invasion of physics by information theory

Robert Spekkens Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
March 26, 2014

PIRSA:14030085
Quantum Physics
Ambiguities in order-theoretic formulations of thermodynamics

Harvey Brown University of Oxford
March 21, 2014

PIRSA:14030093
Quantum Physics
Universal topological quantum computation from a superconductor/Abelian quantum Hall heterostructure

Roger Mong University of Pittsburgh
March 19, 2014

PIRSA:14030118
Quantum Physics
A histories perpective on bounding quantum correlations

Joe Henson BNP Paribas Asset Management London
March 18, 2014

PIRSA:14030111
Quantum Physics
Seeing is Believing: Direct Observation of a General Quantum State

Jeff Lundeen University of Ottawa
March 17, 2014

PIRSA:14030110
Quantum Physics
Maximal Privacy Without Coherence

Debbie Leung Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC)
March 12, 2014

PIRSA:14030105
Quantum Physics
Psi-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states

Matthew Leifer Chapman University
February 18, 2014

PIRSA:14020145
Quantum Physics
Probabilistic protocols in quantum information

Joshua Combes University of Colorado Boulder
February 13, 2014

PIRSA:14020138
Quantum Physics

A non-commuting stabilizer formalism

Xiaotong Ni Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics - Albert Einstein Institute (AEI)
April 09, 2014

PIRSA:14040136
Quantum Physics

General Relativity & Quantum Cosmology
We propose a non-commutative extension of the Pauli stabilizer formalism. The aim is to describe a class of many-body quantum states which is richer than the standard Pauli stabilizer states. In our framework, stabilizer operators are tensor products of single-qubit operators drawn from the group {\alpha I, X,S}, where \alpha=e^{i\pi/4} and S=diag(1,i). We provide techniques to efficiently compute various properties, related to e.g. bipartite entanglement, expectation values of local observables, preparation by means of quantum circuits, parent Hamiltonians etc. We also highlight significant differences compared to the Pauli stabilizer formalism. In particular we give examples of states in our formalism which cannot arise in the Pauli stabilizer formalism, such as topological models that supports non-abelian anyons. This is a joint work with O. Buerschaper and M. van den Nest.
Beyond local causality: causation and correlation after Bell

Matthew Pusey University of York
April 08, 2014

PIRSA:14040130
Quantum Physics
There is now a remarkable mathematical theory of causation. But applying this theory to a Bell scenario implies the Bell inequalities, which are violated in experiment. We alleviate this tension by translating the basic definitions of the theory into the framework of generalised probabilistic theories. We find that a surprising number of results carry over: the d-separation criterion for conditional independence (the no-signalling principle on steroids), and even certain quantitative limits on correlations. Finally, we begin a classification of the causal structures, such as the Bell scenarios, that are "interesting" from this perspective. Joint work with Joe Henson and Raymond Lal.
Quantum Computing with Noninteracting Particles

Alex Arkhipov Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
April 02, 2014

PIRSA:14040077
Quantum Physics
We introduce an abstract model of computation corresponding to an experiment in which identical, non-interacting bosons are sent through a non-adaptive linear circuit before being measured. We show that despite the very limited nature of the model, an exact classical simulation would imply a collapse of the polynomial hierarchy. Moreover, under plausible conjectures, a "noisy" approximate simulation would do the same. This gives evidence that quantum computers can sample a distribution that classical computers cannot even approximate, even when restricted to use no entanglement except that arising from particles being identical. We briefly discuss experimental prospects for realizing this model. This talk is based on The Computational Complexity of Linear Optics [STOC '11], which is joint work with Scott Aaronson.
Incompatibility of observables in quantum theory and other probabilistic theories
April 01, 2014

PIRSA:14040075
Quantum Physics
We introduce a new way of quantifying the degrees of incompatibility of two observables in a probabilistic physical theory and, based on this, a global measure of the degree of incompatibility inherent in such theories. This opens up a flexible way of comparing probabilistic theories with respect to the nonclassical feature of incompatibility. We show that quantum theory contains observables that are as incompatible as any probabilistic physical theory can have. In particular, we prove that two of the most common pairs of complementary observables (position and momentum; number and phase) are maximally incompatible. However, if one adopts a more refined measure of the degree of incompatibility, for instance, by restricting the comparison to binary observables, it turns out that there are probabilistic theories whose inherent degree of incompatibility is greater than that of quantum theory. Finally, we analyze the noise tolerance of the incompatibility of a pair of observables in a CHSH-Bell experiment.
The invasion of physics by information theory

Robert Spekkens Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
March 26, 2014

PIRSA:14030085
Quantum Physics
When we think of a revolution in physics, we usually think of a physical theory that manages to overthrow its predecessor. There is another kind of revolution, however, that typically happens more slowly but that is often the key to achieving the first sort: it is the discovery of a novel perspective on an existing physical theory. The use of least-action principles, symmetry principles, and thermodynamic principles are good historical examples. It turns out that we can refine our understanding of many of these principles by characterizing certain properties of physical states as resources. I will discuss some of the highlights of two resource theories: the resource theory of asymmetry, which characterizes the relations among quantum states that break a symmetry; and the resource theory of athermality, which characterizes the relations among quantum states that deviate from thermal equilibrium. In particular, I will discuss how Noether's theorem does not capture all of the consequences of symmetries of the dynamics, and how the second law of thermodynamics does not capture all of the constraints on thermodynamic transitions. Finally, I will show that both asymmetry and athermality are informational resources, and that rehabilitated versions of Noether's theorem and the second law can both be understood as constraints on data processing. Considerations such as these---as well as evidence from other fronts of the invasion---make a compelling case for the revolutionary cause of reconceiving physics from an information-theoretic perspective.
Ambiguities in order-theoretic formulations of thermodynamics

Harvey Brown University of Oxford
March 21, 2014

PIRSA:14030093
Quantum Physics
Since the 1909 work of Carathéodory, an axiomatic approach to thermodynamics has gained ground which highlights the role of the the binary relation of adiabatic accessibility between equilibrium states. A feature of Carathédory's system is that the version therein of the second law contains an ambiguity about the nature of irreversible adiabatic processes, making it weaker than the traditional Kelvin-Planck statement of the law. This talk attempts first to clarify the nature of this ambiguity, by defining the arrow of time in thermodynamics by way of the Equilibrium Principle (``Minus First Law''). It then examines the extent to which the 1989 axiomatisation of Lieb and Yngvason shares the same ambiguity, despite proposing a very different approach to the second law.
Universal topological quantum computation from a superconductor/Abelian quantum Hall heterostructure

Roger Mong University of Pittsburgh
March 19, 2014

PIRSA:14030118
Quantum Physics
Non-Abelian anyons promise to reveal spectacular features of quantum mechanics that could ultimately provide the foundation for a decoherence-free quantum computer. The Moore-Read quantum Hall state and a (relatively simple) two-dimensional p+ip superconductor both support Ising non-Abelian anyons, also referred to as Majorana zero modes. Here we construct a novel two-dimensional superconductor in which charge-2e Cooper pairs are built from fractionalized quasiparticles, and like the Z3 Read-Rezayi state, harbors Fibonacci anyons that--unlike Ising anyons--allow for universal topological quantum computation solely through braiding.
A histories perpective on bounding quantum correlations

Joe Henson BNP Paribas Asset Management London
March 18, 2014

PIRSA:14030111
Quantum Physics
There has recently been much interest in finding simple principles that explain the particular sets of experimental probabilities that are possible with quantum mechanics in Bell-type experiments. In the quantum gravity community, similar questions had been raised, about whether a certain generalisation of quantum mechanics allowed more than quantum mechanics in this regard. We now bring these two strands of work together to see what can be learned on both sides.
Seeing is Believing: Direct Observation of a General Quantum State

Jeff Lundeen University of Ottawa
March 17, 2014

PIRSA:14030110
Quantum Physics
Central to quantum theory, the wavefunction is a complex distribution associated with a quantum system. Despite its fundamental role, it is typically introduced as an abstract element of the theory with no explicit definition. Rather, physicists come to a working understanding of it through its use to calculate measurement outcome probabilities through the Born Rule. Tomographic methods can reconstruct the wavefunction from measured probabilities. In contrast, I present a method to directly measure the wavefunction so that its real and imaginary components appear straight on our measurement apparatus. I will also present new work extending this concept to mixed quantum states. This extension directly measures a little-known proposal by Dirac for a classical analog to a quantum operator. Furthermore, it reveals that our direct measurement is a rigorous example of a quasi-probability phase-space (i.e. x,p) distribution that is closely related to the Q, P, and Wigner functions. Our direct measurement method gives the quantum state a plain and general meaning in terms of a specific set of simple operations in the lab.
Maximal Privacy Without Coherence

Debbie Leung Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC)
March 12, 2014

PIRSA:14030105
Quantum Physics
Privacy and coherence have long been considered closely related properties of a quantum state. Indeed, a coherently transmitted quantum state is inherently private. Surprisingly, coherent quantum communication is not always required for privacy: there are quantum channels that are too noisy to transmit quantum information but it can send private classical information. Here, we ask how different the private classical and the quantum capacities can be. We present a class of channels N_d with input dimension d^2, quantum capacity Q(N_d) <= 1, and private classical capacity P(N_d) = log d. These channels asymptotically saturate an interesting inequality P(N) <= (log d_A + Q(N))/2 for any channel N with input dimension d_A, and capture the essence of privacy stripped of the confounding influence of coherence.
Psi-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states

Matthew Leifer Chapman University
February 18, 2014

PIRSA:14020145
Quantum Physics
The status of the quantum state is perhaps the most controversial issue in the foundations of quantum theory. Is it an epistemic state (representing knowledge, information, or belief) or an ontic state (a direct reflection of reality)? In the ontological models framework, quantum states correspond to probability measures over more fundamental states of reality. The quantum state is then ontic if every pair of pure states corresponds to a pair of measures that do not overlap, and is otherwise epistemic. Recently, several authors have derived theorems that aim to show that the quantum state must be ontic in this framework. Each of these theorems involve auxiliary assumptions of varying degrees of plausibility. Without such assumptions, it has been shown that models exist in which the quantum state is epistemic. However, the definition of an epistemic quantum state used in these works is extremely permissive. Only two quantum states need correspond to overlapping measures and furthermore the amount of overlap may be arbitrarily small. In order to provide an explanation of quantum phenomena such as no-cloning and the indistinguishability of pure states, the amount of overlap should be comparable to the inner product of the quantum states. In this talk, I show, without making auxiliary assumptions, that the ratio of overlap to inner product must go to zero exponentially in Hilbert space dimension for some families of states. This is done by connecting the overlap to Kochen-Specker noncontextuality, from which we infer that any contextuality inequality gives a bound on the ratio of overlap to inner product.
Probabilistic protocols in quantum information

Joshua Combes University of Colorado Boulder
February 13, 2014

PIRSA:14020138
Quantum Physics
Probabilistic protocols in quantum information are an attempt to improve performance by occasionally reporting a better result than could be expected from a deterministic protocol. Here we show that probabilistic protocols can never improve performance beyond the quantum limits on the corresponding deterministic protocol. To illustrate this result we examine three common probabilistic protocols: probabilistic amplification, weak value amplification, and probabilistic metrology. In each of these protocols we show explicitly that the optimal deterministic protocol is better than the corresponding probabilistic protocol when the probabilistic nature of the protocol is correctly accounted for.

Title	Speaker(s)	Date	Talk Type	Info link
A non-commuting stabilizer formalism	Xiaotong Ni	2014-04-09	Scientific Series	View details
Beyond local causality: causation and correlation after Bell	Matthew Pusey	2014-04-08	Scientific Series	View details
Quantum Computing with Noninteracting Particles	Alex Arkhipov	2014-04-02	Scientific Series	View details
Incompatibility of observables in quantum theory and other probabilistic theories		2014-04-01	Scientific Series	View details
The invasion of physics by information theory	Robert Spekkens	2014-03-26	Scientific Series	View details
Ambiguities in order-theoretic formulations of thermodynamics	Harvey Brown	2014-03-21	Scientific Series	View details
Universal topological quantum computation from a superconductor/Abelian quantum Hall heterostructure	Roger Mong	2014-03-19	Scientific Series	View details
A histories perpective on bounding quantum correlations	Joe Henson	2014-03-18	Scientific Series	View details
Seeing is Believing: Direct Observation of a General Quantum State	Jeff Lundeen	2014-03-17	Scientific Series	View details
Maximal Privacy Without Coherence	Debbie Leung	2014-03-12	Scientific Series	View details
Psi-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states	Matthew Leifer	2014-02-18	Scientific Series	View details
Probabilistic protocols in quantum information	Joshua Combes	2014-02-13	Scientific Series	View details

Supported by

Format results

A non-commuting stabilizer formalism

Beyond local causality: causation and correlation after Bell

Quantum Computing with Noninteracting Particles

Incompatibility of observables in quantum theory and other probabilistic theories

The invasion of physics by information theory

Ambiguities in order-theoretic formulations of thermodynamics

Universal topological quantum computation from a superconductor/Abelian quantum Hall heterostructure

A histories perpective on bounding quantum correlations

Seeing is Believing: Direct Observation of a General Quantum State

Maximal Privacy Without Coherence

Psi-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states

Probabilistic protocols in quantum information

A non-commuting stabilizer formalism

Beyond local causality: causation and correlation after Bell

Quantum Computing with Noninteracting Particles

Incompatibility of observables in quantum theory and other probabilistic theories

The invasion of physics by information theory

Ambiguities in order-theoretic formulations of thermodynamics

Universal topological quantum computation from a superconductor/Abelian quantum Hall heterostructure

A histories perpective on bounding quantum correlations

Seeing is Believing: Direct Observation of a General Quantum State

Maximal Privacy Without Coherence

Psi-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states

Probabilistic protocols in quantum information