Talks

In this talk I’ll highlight the existence of gaps in the spectrum of GWs poorly explored by current observations and that may contain information about BSM physics or primordial cosmology. I’ll focus on the muHz gap, and explain how to use the resonance absorption of GWs by binary systems (as the Earth-Moon system or binary pulsars) to access this band. I’ll also highlight the potential of high frequency (\omega > kHz) GWs. The focus of this second part will be the use of cavities to detect these signals, together with a brief discussion of sources and what can be learned from them.

Zoom Link:  https://pitp.zoom.us/j/94501758748?pwd=amFsTjV5Z1c5SHJrVVBCanVCRHRMUT09

Understanding gravity in the framework of quantum mechanics is one of the great challenges in modern physics. Along this line, a prime question is to find whether gravity is a quantum entity subject to the rules of quantum mechanics. It is fair to say that there are no feasible ideas yet to test the quantum coherent behaviour of gravity directly in a laboratory experiment. I will introduce an idea for such a test based on the principle that two objects cannot be entangled without a quantum mediator.  I will show that despite the weakness of gravity, the phase evolution induced by the gravitational interaction of two micron size test masses in adjacent matter-wave interferometers can detectably entangle them even when they are placed far apart enough to keep Casimir-Polder forces at bay. I will provide a prescription for witnessing this entanglement, which certifies gravity as a quantum coherent mediator, through simple correlation measurements between two spins: one embedded in each test mass. Fundamentally, the above entanglement is shown to certify the presence of non-zero off-diagonal terms in the coherent state basis of the gravitational field modes.

Zoom link:  https://pitp.zoom.us/j/99584743899?pwd=aHl1cVlpK29ZVDkrdFZyM01GemJJdz09

In this talk, I will present two recent works on electronic lattice models, both of which utilize novel numerical algorithms to achieve a deeper understanding of the many-electron problem. Competing and intertwined orders including inhomogeneous patterns of spin and charge are observed in many correlated electron materials, such as high-temperature superconductors. In arXiv:2202.11741, we introduce a new development of constrained-path auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFMQC) method and study the interplay between thermal and quantum fluctuations in the two-dimensional Hubbard model. We identify a finite-temperature phase transition below which charge ordering sets in. Quantum gas microscopy has developed into a powerful tool to explore strongly correlated quantum systems.  However, discerning phases with off-diagonal long range order requires the ability to extract these correlations from site-resolved measurements. In the second work arXiv:2209.10565, we study the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model using the variational uniform matrix product states algorithm. We show that a multi-scale complexity measure can pinpoint the transition to and from the bond ordered wave phase with an off-diagonal order parameter, sandwiched between diagonal charge and spin density wave phases, using only diagonal descriptors.

Zoom link:  https://pitp.zoom.us/j/97325001971?pwd=QXNmU2I0L3BxQVErMEZWSDF2bGZ0QT09

Nonclassicality, as witnessed by the incapacity of Classical Causal Theory (CCT) of explaining a system's behavior given its causal structure, come to be one of the hottest topics in Quantum Foundations over the last decades, a movement that was motivated both by its vast range of practical applications and by the powerful insights it provides about the rules of the quantum world. Among the many attempts at understanding/quantifying this phenomenon, we highlight the idea of inquiring how further would it be necessary to relax the causal structure associated with a given system in order to have its nonclassical behavior explained by CCT. More recently, we showed that the relaxation demanded to explain the behavior of a subset of variables in a given experiment may not be allowed by the embedding causal structure when considering the behavior of the remaining variables, which led to a new way of witnessing nonclassicality. In this seminar, we discuss a new way of quantifying this incompatibility and possible generalizations of this approach to different scenarios.

Zoom link:  https://pitp.zoom.us/j/96051313203?pwd=bFNhOEhkSVhXWk8yd1hVZWVVa0U4UT09

This lecture is devoted to Noether’s theorems and the study of the interplay between symmetries and conservation laws, from ordinary mechanics to general relativity. In order to start on a common ground and interest a broad audience, we will begin with a review of Noether’s (first) theorem in ordinary non-relativistic mechanics. This will enable us to settle some subtleties, agree on conventions, and especially explore some curious and lesser-known symmetry features of familiar models (such as particles and celestial mechanics). We will then move on to field theory, and discuss the construction of conserved currents and energy-momentum tensors. This will include a discussion of conserved quantities in general relativity. Finally, we will turn to the core of the topic, which is Noether’s (second) theorem for gauge symmetries. After recalling the basic properties of gauge theories in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian form, we will derive the consequences of gauge symmetry for the construction of conserved charges. For this, we will introduce the so-called covariant phase space formalism, which enables to construct symmetry charges and algebras, and derive (non) conservation laws. This will be illustrated in Maxwell’s theory and in general relativity. In particular, we will focus in depth on the example of three-dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble model in which all aspects of symmetries can be understood. We will end with an outlook towards the notion of asymptotic symmetries and their use in classical and quantum gravity. Ideally, the audience should be familiar with: Hamiltonian mechanics differential forms basic features of general relativity