The contextual Heisenberg Microscope

          @misc{ scivideos_PIRSA:25100173,
            doi = {10.48660/25100173},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/25100173},
            author = {Larsson, Jan-{\r{A}}ke},
            keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
            language = {en},
            title = {The contextual Heisenberg Microscope},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics},
            year = {2025},
            month = {oct},
            note = {PIRSA:25100173 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/index.php/pirsa/25100173}}
          }
          

Abstract

The Heisenberg microscope provides a powerful mental image of the measurement process of quantum mechanics (QM), attempting to explain the uncertainty relation through an uncontrollable back-action from the measurement device. However, Heisenberg's proposed back-action uses features that are not present in the QM description of the world, and according to Bohr not present in the world. Therefore, Bohr argues, the mental image proposed by Heisenberg should be avoided. Later developments by Bell and Kochen-Specker shows that a model that contains the features used for the Heisenberg microscope is in principle possible but must necessarily be nonlocal and contextual. In this paper we will re-examine the measurement process within a restriction of QM known as Stabilizer QM, that still exhibits for example Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger nonlocality and Peres-Mermin contextuality. The re-examination will use a recent extension of stabilizer QM, the Contextual Ontological Model (COM), where the system state gives a complete description of future measurement outcomes reproducing the quantum predictions, including the mentioned phenomena. We will see that the resulting contextual Heisenberg microscope back-action can be completely described within COM, and that the associated randomness originates in the initial state of the pointer system, exactly as in the original description of the Heisenberg microscope. The presence of contextuality, usually seen as prohibiting ontological models, suggests that the contextual Heisenberg microscope picture could perhaps be enabled in general QM.