Ord, G. (2008). What is a Wavefunction?. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. https://pirsa.org/08110045
MLA
Ord, Garnet. What is a Wavefunction?. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Nov. 18, 2008, https://pirsa.org/08110045
BibTex
@misc{ scivideos_PIRSA:08110045,
doi = {10.48660/08110045},
url = {https://pirsa.org/08110045},
author = {Ord, Garnet},
keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
language = {en},
title = {What is a Wavefunction?},
publisher = {Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics},
year = {2008},
month = {nov},
note = {PIRSA:08110045 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/index.php/pirsa/08110045}}
}
Conventional quantum mechanics answers this question by specifying the required mathematical properties of wavefunctions and invoking the Born postulate. The ontological question remains unanswered. There is one exception to this. A variation of the Feynman chessboard model allows a classical stochastic process to assemble a wavefunction, based solely on the geometry of spacetime paths. A direct comparison of how a related process assembles a Probability Density Function reveals both how and why PDFs and wavefunctions differ from the perspective of an underlying kinetic theory. If the fine-scale motion of a particle through spacetime is continuous and position is a single valued function of time, then we are able to describe ensembles of paths directly by PDFs. However, should paths have time reversed portions so that position is not a single-valued function of time, a simple Bernoulli counting of paths fails, breaking the link to PDF\'s! Under certain circumstances, correcting the path-counting to accommodate time-reversed sections results in wavefunctions not PDFs. The result is that a single `switch\' simultaneously turns on both special relativity and quantum propagation. Physically, fine-scale random motion in space alone yields a diffusive process with PDFs governed by the Telegraph equations. If the fine-scale motion includes both directions in time, the result is a wavefunction satisfying the Dirac equation that also provides a detailed answer to the title question.