Scale invariance, Weyl gravity, and Einstein's three objections

          @misc{ scivideos_PIRSA:10120051,
            doi = {10.48660/10120051},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/10120051},
            author = {Westman, Hans},
            keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
            language = {en},
            title = {Scale invariance, Weyl gravity, and Einstein{\textquoteright}s three objections},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics},
            year = {2010},
            month = {dec},
            note = {PIRSA:10120051 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/index.php/pirsa/10120051}}
          }
          

Abstract

Basic epistemological considerations suggest that the laws of nature should be scale invariant and no fundamental length scale should exist in nature. Indeed, the standard model action contains only two terms that break scale invariance: the Einstein-Hilbert term and the Higgs mass term. We give a simple introduction to Weyl's 1918 scale invariant gravity based on basic epistemology and discuss the three main objections put forth by Einstein: 1) the hydrogen spectrum depends on their previous history of the atom (something which is empirically ruled out to a high precision), 2) there is no account for proper time in Weyl's theory, and 3) fieldequations are 4th order leading to Ostrogradsky-type instabilities. We show that the first two objections can readily be answered. In particular the second objection is answered by developing a physical model of an ideal clock from which proper time is identified as the reading of the clock. We then outline an attempt to tackle the third objection by breaking foliation invariance and so introduce a preferred simultaneity. We show that Lorentz invariance can still be maintained if only the gravitational sector is sensitive to the preferred foliation. We impose the restrictions I) the new theory should contain general relativity in the limit of zero scale curvature, II) no fundamental length scales should appear, III) the field equations should be of second order.