PIRSA:11120041

Why pre-Hawking Radiation never becomes Thermal

APA

Greenwood, E. (2011). Why pre-Hawking Radiation never becomes Thermal. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. https://pirsa.org/11120041

MLA

Greenwood, Eric. Why pre-Hawking Radiation never becomes Thermal. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Dec. 01, 2011, https://pirsa.org/11120041

BibTex

          @misc{ scivideos_PIRSA:11120041,
            doi = {10.48660/11120041},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/11120041},
            author = {Greenwood, Eric},
            keywords = {Cosmology},
            language = {en},
            title = {Why pre-Hawking Radiation never becomes Thermal},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics},
            year = {2011},
            month = {dec},
            note = {PIRSA:11120041 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/index.php/pirsa/11120041}}
          }
          

Eric Greenwood Case Western Reserve University

Talk numberPIRSA:11120041
Source RepositoryPIRSA
Talk Type Scientific Series
Subject

Abstract

Hawking's discovery of black holes radiance along with Bekenstein's conjecture of the generalized second law of thermodynamics inspired a conceptually pleasing connection between gravity, thermodynamics and quantum theory. However, the discovery that the spectrum of the radiation is in fact thermal, together with the no-hair theorem, has brought along with it some undesirable consequences, most notably the information loss paradox. There have been many proposals to the resolution of this paradox, with the most natural resolution being that during the time of collapse the radiation given off is not completely thermal and can carry small amounts of information with it. In this talk, we will revisit the so-called pre-Hawking radiation given off during the scenario of gravitational collapse by utilizing the so-called functional Schroedinger equation (FSE) and quantum kinetic equation (QKE). Here we find that the spectrum never becomes thermal and discuss the reasons for this. Finally we will discuss the implications of this result, as well as previous results, toward the resolution of the information paradox.