PIRSA:13030107

Video URL

https://pirsa.org/13030107

Neorealism and the Internal Language of Topoi

Wolters, S. (2013). Neorealism and the Internal Language of Topoi. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. https://pirsa.org/13030107

Wolters, Sander. Neorealism and the Internal Language of Topoi. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Mar. 12, 2013, https://pirsa.org/13030107 

          @misc{ scivideos_PIRSA:13030107,
            doi = {10.48660/13030107},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/13030107},
            author = {Wolters, Sander},
            keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
            language = {en},
            title = {Neorealism and the Internal Language of Topoi},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics},
            year = {2013},
            month = {mar},
            note = {PIRSA:13030107 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/index.php/pirsa/13030107}}
          }

Sander Wolters Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

Talk numberPIRSA:13030107
DOI10.48660/13030107
Source RepositoryPIRSA
Collection
Talk Type Scientific Series
Subject

Abstract

Crudely formulated, the idea of neorealism, in the way that Chris Isham and Andreas Doering use it, means that each theory of physics, in its mathematical formulation should share certain structural properties of classical physics. These properties are chosen to allow some degree of realism in the interpretation (for example, physical variables always have values). Apart from restricting the form of physical theories, neorealism does increase freedom in the shape of physical theories in another way. Theories of physics may be interpreted in other topoi than the category of sets and functions.  In my talk I will concentrate on two topos models for quantum theory. The contravariant model of Butterfield, Isham and Doering on the one hand, and the covariant model of Heunen, Landsman and Spitters on the other. I will argue that when we think of the topoi as generalized categories of sets (i.e. when we use the internal perspective of the topoi at hand), these two models are closely related, and both resemble classical physics.  I will assume no background knowledge in topos theory.