Talks

Dataset augmentation, the practice of applying a wide array of domain-specific transformations to synthetically expand a training set, is a standard tool in supervised learning. While effective in tasks such as visual recognition, the set of transformations must be carefully designed, implemented, and tested for every new domain, limiting its re-use and generality. In this talk, I will describe recent methods that  transform data not in input space, but in a feature space found by unsupervised learning. We start with data points mapped to a learned feature space and apply simple transformations such as adding noise, interpolating, or extrapolating between them. Working in the space of context vectors generated by sequence-to-sequence recurrent neural networks, this simple and domain-agnostic technique is demonstrated to be effective for both static and sequential data. 

Bio: Graham Taylor is an Associate Professor at the University of Guelph where he leads the Machine Learning Research Group. He is a member of the Vector Insitute for Artificial Intelligence and is an Azrieli Global Scholar with the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. He received his PhD in Computer Science from the University of Toronto in 2009, where he was advised by Geoffrey Hinton and Sam Roweis. He spent two years as a postdoc at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University working with Chris Bregler, Rob Fergus, and Yann LeCun. 

Dr. Taylor's research focuses on statistical machine learning, with an emphasis on deep learning and sequential data. Much of his work has focused on "seeing people" in images and video, for example, activity and gesture recognition, pose estimation, emotion recognition, and biometrics.

Calculating the path integral over all causal sets will take a lot of computing power, and requires a way to suppress non-manifold like causal sets. To work towards these goals we can start by taking the path integral over a restricted class of causal sets, the 2d orders. Using these have found a phase transition and been able to study the Hartle-Hawking wave function in causal sets. In this talk I will present these recent results (arXiv:1410.8775 and arXiv:1706.06432), and some preliminary data exploring how the behavior of the 2d orders is influenced by coupling them to an Ising model.

Real-world quantum systems description - Pure state vs Mixed states - Purification of Mixed States; Generalized measurement - Mixtures of "ideal measurement" - Ideal measurement of a composite system - POVMs.

Infinite Dimensional Systems -  Dirac's approach vs von Neumann's approach; Operational Postulates for open (real-world) quantum systems: probabilistic mixtures of pure states vs Partial description of composite system (partial trace, reduced state) - Operational postulate 1. 

After a small review on divergent series and Borel resummation I will discuss a geometric approach based on Picard-Lefschetz theory to study the interplay between perturbative and non-perturbative effects in the QM path integral.

Such approach can be used to characterize when the perturbative series gives the full answer and when the inclusion of non-trivial saddles--instantons--is mandatory. I will then show how a simple deformation of the original perturbation theory allows to recover the full non perturbative answer from the perturbative coefficients alone, without the need of including instanton corrections. I will illustrate this technique in examples which are known to contain non-perturbative effects, such as the (supersymmetric) double-well potential, the pure anharmonic oscillator, and the perturbative expansion around a false vacuum.