Talks

I discuss work in progress on the no-boundary state of the universe in quantum cosmology, emphasizing the key role played by the inclusion of an observer in obtaining a reasonable no-boundary state. For concreteness we focus on a 2d toy model, namely dS JT gravity. This model has avatars of important issues with the wavefunction of the universe in inflationary models. The issues are that the wavefunction predicts a small universe (whereas our universe is rather large), and that it is not normalizable. I show that the non-normalizability is resolved by promoting dS JT gravity to sine dilaton gravity, a type of UV completion of dS JT gravity of which I discuss the cosmological interpretation. I then argue that the issue of predicting a small universe (in this toy model) is resolved by including an observer in the theory. With the observer, the leading contribution is a bra-ket wormhole. The observer's no boundary state is a (maximally mixed) identity matrix, and thus prefers neither small nor large universes.

In this talk, I will discuss the complexity of a fermionic analogue of Quantum k-SAT. In this Fermionic k-SAT problem, one is given the task to decide whether there is a fermionic state in the null-space of a collection of fermionic, parity-conserving, projectors on n fermionic modes, where each fermionic projector involves at most k fermionic modes. We prove that this problem can be solved efficiently classically for k = 2. In addition, we show that deciding whether there exists a satisfying assignment with a given fixed particle number parity can also be done efficiently classically for Fermionic 2-SAT: this problem is a quantum-fermionic extension of asking whether a classical 2-SAT problem has a solution with a given Hamming weight parity. We also prove that deciding whether there exists a satisfying assignment for particle-number-conserving Fermionic 2-SAT for some given particle number is NP-complete. Complementary to this, we show that Fermionic 9-SAT is QMA_1-hard. 

In 1914, Ramanujan wrote down 17 intriguing formulas for 1/pi, which motivated the modern-day machinery of computing trillions of digits of pi. Most of these formulas lay unproven until the 1980s. The Canadian Borwein brothers wrote a comprehensive treatise proving these formulas in the 1980s. We can now ask, “What is the physics behind Ramanujan’s pi”? I will argue that the physics connection can be found via logarithmic conformal field theories, for instance, those studied in the fractional quantum hall effect, polymers, and percolation. The CFT connection gives rise to an infinite number of new formulas for pi. In contrast, the myriad Ramanujan formulas provoke us into looking into faster converging basis for conformal correlators, which is, in turn, provided by the stringy dispersion relation mentioned above.