Search Talks

We studied t1-t2-J1-J2 model on Honeycomb lattice at finite doping. We find that when t_1 is very small, the t1-t2-J1-J2 model on Honeycomb lattice may be in a supperconducting phase. Such a supperconducting phase is not driven by the pairing, but by entanglement.

We discuss two basic principles to unify the understanding of both cuprates and iron-based superconductors: (1) the correspondence principle— the short range magnetic exchange interactions and the Fermi surfaces act collaboratively to achieve high Tc superconductivity and determine pairing symmetries; (2) the selective magnetic pairing rule: the superconductivity is only induced by the magnetic exchange couplings from the superexchange mechanism through cation-anion-cation chemical bondings but not those from direct exchange couplings resulted from the direct cation's d-d chemical bondings. These two principles provide a unified explanation why the d-wave pairing symmetry and the s-wave pairing symmetry are robust respectively in cuprates and iron-based superconductors. In the meanwhile, the above two principles can serve as direct guiding rules to search new unconventional high Tc superconductors. We propose that the third classes of unconventional high Tc superconducting candidates in compounds formed by cation-anion trigonal bipyramidal complexes with a d7 filling configuration on the cation ions. Their superconducting states are expected to be dominated by the d+id pairing symmetry. Synthesizing these compounds and verifying the prediction can convincingly establish the high Tc superconducting mechanism and pave a way to design new high Tc superconductors

In underdoped cuprate superconductors, a rich competition occurs between superconductivity and charge density wave order (CDW). Under debate, however, is whether rotational symmetry breaking (nematicity) also plays a central role -- whether it occurs intrinsically and generically or merely as a consequence of other orders. Here we employ resonant x-ray scattering in stripe-ordered (La,X)2CuO4 to probe the relationship between electronic nematicity of the Cu 3d orbitals, structural orthorhombicity of the (La,X)2O4 layers and CDW order. We find distinct temperature dependences of the structural orthorhombicity and the electronic nematicity, with the electronic nematicity, but no structural orthorhombicity enhancement below the onset of CDW order. These results indicate electronic nematicity is an order parameter that is distinct from a purely structural order parameter in underdoped cuprates.