Search Talks

In order to solve the problem of time in quantum gravity, various approaches to a relational quantum dynamics have been proposed. In this talk, I will exploit quantum reduction maps to illustrate a previously unknown equivalence between three of the well-known ones: (1) relational observables in the clock-neutral picture of Dirac quantization, (2) Page and Wootters’ (PW) Schrödinger picture formalism, and (3) the relational Heisenberg picture obtained via symmetry reduction. Constituting three faces of the same dynamics, we call this equivalence the trinity. To establish the equivalence, a quantization procedure for relational Dirac observables is developed using covariant POVMs which encompass non-ideal clocks. The quantum reduction maps reveal this procedure as the quantum analog of the classical method of gauge-invariantly extending gauge-fixed quantities. The quantum reduction maps also allow one to extend a recent ‘clock-neutral’ approach to changing temporal reference frames, transforming relational observables and states between different clock choices, and demonstrate a clock dependent temporal nonlocality effect. Using the trinity, I will discuss how Kuchar's three fundamental criticisms against the PW formalism, namely that its conditional probabilities would (i) yield the wrong localization probabilities for relativistic particles, (ii) violate the constraints, and (iii) produce incorrect transition probabilities, can be resolved. Given the trinity, these resolutions also apply to approaches (1) and (3) and corroborate the PW formalism, if done correctly, as a viable approach to the problem of time. Time permitting, I will explain, however, why the slogan `time from entanglement' in the PW formalism is misleading.

It is expected that the Betti version of the geometric Langlands program should ultimately be about the equivalence of two 4-dimensional topological field theories. In this talk I will give an overview of ongoing work in categorified sheaf theory and explain how one can use it to describe the categories of boundary conditions arising on the spectral side.

I'll explain the TFT perspective on holomorphic-topological twists of 3d N=4 and 4d N=2 theories, and outline some connections between the topics discussed in Justin and Davide's previous lectures, and various ongoing work of Justin, Philsang, Kevin, Davide, Tudor, myself, etc.

The area law for entanglement provides one of the most important connections between information theory and quantum many-body physics. It is not only related to the universality of quantum phases, but also to efficient numerical simulations in the ground state (i.e., the lowest energy state).  Various numerical observations have led to a strong belief that the area law is true for every non-critical phase in short-range interacting systems [1]. The so-called area-law conjecture states that the entanglement entropy is proportional to the surface region of subsystem if the ground state is non-critical (or gapped). 

However, the area law for long-range interacting systems is still elusive as the long-range interaction results in correlation patterns similar to the ones in critical phases. Here, we show that for generic non-critical one-dimensional ground states, the area law robustly holds without any corrections even under long-range interactions [2]. Our result guarantees an efficient description of ground states by the matrix-product state in experimentally relevant long-range systems, which justifies the density-matrix renormalization algorithm. In the present talk, I will give an overview of the results, and show ideas of the proof if the time allows. 

[1] J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, ``Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy,'' Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277–306 (2010).

[2] T. Kuwahara and K. Saito, ``Area law of non-critical ground states in 1d long-range interacting systems,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.11547 (2019),

As our understanding of the universe and its fundamental building blocks extends to shorter and shorter distances, experiments capable of probing these scales are becoming increasingly difficult to construct. Fundamental particle physics faces a potential crisis: an absence of data at the shortest possible scales. Yet remarkably, even in the absence of experimental data, the requirement of theoretical consistency puts stringent constraints on viable models of fundamental particles and their interactions. In this talk I’ll discuss a variety of criteria that constrain theories of particles in flat spacetime and de Sitter. Such criteria have the possibility to address questions such as: What low energy theories admit consistent UV completions? Which massive particles are allowed in an interacting theory? Is string theory the unique weakly coupled UV completion of General Relativity?