PIRSA:15050114

Video URL

https://pirsa.org/15050114

Black Holes, Firewalls, and the Complexity of States and Unitary Transformations

Aaronson, S. (2015). Black Holes, Firewalls, and the Complexity of States and Unitary Transformations. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. https://pirsa.org/15050114

Aaronson, Scott. Black Holes, Firewalls, and the Complexity of States and Unitary Transformations. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, May. 27, 2015, https://pirsa.org/15050114 

          @misc{ scivideos_PIRSA:15050114,
            doi = {10.48660/15050114},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/15050114},
            author = {Aaronson, Scott},
            keywords = {Quantum Information},
            language = {en},
            title = {Black Holes, Firewalls, and the Complexity of States and Unitary Transformations},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics},
            year = {2015},
            month = {may},
            note = {PIRSA:15050114 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/pirsa/15050114}}
          }

Scott Aaronson The University of Texas at Austin

Talk numberPIRSA:15050114
DOI10.48660/15050114
Source RepositoryPIRSA
Collection
Talk Type Scientific Series
Subject

Abstract

I'll discuss some recent results, motivated by the black-hole firewall paradox and the AdS/CFT correspondence, about the quantum circuit complexity of preparing certain entangled states and implementing certain unitary transformations.  One result is a strengthening of an argument by Harlow and Hayden: I'll show that, under plausible assumptions, "decoding" useful information from Hawking radiation, as called for by the AMPS "firewall" thought experiment, requires the computational power to invert arbitrary cryptographic one-way functions, something we think not even quantum computers could do in sub-astronomical time.  A second result, joint with Lenny Susskind, considers the circuit complexity of the kinds of states that could arise in AdS/CFT, and shows that, under a reasonable conjecture about complexity classes (PSPACE is not in PP/poly), the complexity indeed becomes superpolynomially large, as predicted by a conjectured relationship between complexity and geometry.  I'll also discuss more general open questions about the complexities of states and unitary transformations (and the connections to quantum money, quantum proofs, and other topics), which I find fascinating even apart from the quantum-gravity motivation.