PIRSA:13020125

Video URL

https://pirsa.org/13020125

A positive and local formalism for quantum theory

Oeckl, R. (2013). A positive and local formalism for quantum theory. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. https://pirsa.org/13020125

Oeckl, Robert. A positive and local formalism for quantum theory. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Feb. 05, 2013, https://pirsa.org/13020125 

          @misc{ scivideos_PIRSA:13020125,
            doi = {10.48660/13020125},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/13020125},
            author = {Oeckl, Robert},
            keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
            language = {en},
            title = {A positive and local formalism for quantum theory},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics},
            year = {2013},
            month = {feb},
            note = {PIRSA:13020125 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/pirsa/13020125}}
          }

Robert Oeckl Universidad Nacional Autónoma De Mexico (UNAM)

Talk numberPIRSA:13020125
DOI10.48660/13020125
Source RepositoryPIRSA
Collection
Talk Type Scientific Series
Subject

Abstract

The general boundary formulation (GBF) is an atemporal, but spacetime local formulation of quantum theory. Usually it is presented in terms of the amplitude formalism, which, in the presence of a background time, recovers the pure state formalism of the standard formulation of quantum theory. After reviewing the essentials of the amplitude formalism I will introduce a new "positive formalism", which recovers instead a mixed state formalism. This allows to define general quantum operations within the GBF and opens it to quantum information theory. Moreover, the transition to the positive formalism eliminates operationally irrelevant structure, making the extraction of measurement probabilities more direct. As a consequence, the probability interpretation takes on a remarkably simple and compelling form. I shall describe implications of the positive formalism, both for our understanding of quantum theory and for the practical formulation of quantum theories. I also observe a certain convergence with Lucien Hardy's operator tensor formulation of quantum theory, on which I hope to comment